evc06 The Young Age of the Earth

evc06 The Young Age of the Earth explains why scientific evidence supports a young earth against evolutions long time spans.

evc06 The Young Age of the Earth explains why scientific evidence supports a young earth against evolutions long time spans.

evc06 The Young Age of the Earth

The Young Age of the Earth: Scientific Evidence against Evolution

by David Cox

[evc06] v1 ©2008 www.coxtracts.com.com
You may freely reproduce this tract for non-profit purposes.

The Salinity of the Oceans – Every year rainfall carries dirt from the mountains to the seas. Once in the oceans, there is no way for the salt in this dirt to be removed. The Dead Sea is an example of what happens when the salt concentration grows. (The Dead Sea is small in comparison to the oceans.) According to the calculations of experts, the concentration of the salt in the oceans on the entire planet will be as much as the Dead Sea in a few million years.

Time is important – Evolutionists use very large amounts of time for the formation of the universe and living beings. According to them, only “a few billion years” ago, the universe, the earth, and life on earth was almost as it is today. They want to propose that the foundation events happened billions of years ago, or even further back, and every year they add more large amounts of time to their theories.

Continue reading

evc05 A Young Earth: There is not enough Time for Evolution

evc05 A Young Earth: There is not enough Time for Evolution explains why our earth is young, and evolutionists are wrong.

evc05 A Young Earth: There is not enough Time for Evolution explains why our earth is young, and evolutionists are wrong.

By David Cox

[evc05] v1.1 ©2008 www.coxtracts.com
You may freely reproduce this tract for non-profit purposes.

Scientists talk about the thousands of years of the formation of the world, but then they changed, this to 10,000 years, then to 100,000 years, and then to millions of years. Now they talk about billions of years. The reason for this is that evolution has no evidence in nature. We do not see the changes as evolutionists say are currently happening. Therefore, in defending their atheistic faith (which is against God the Creator of the universe), they demand millions of years for evolution to have a process so slow that we cannot observe it. One asks, “If a scientist cannot observe and measure something, is it possible for him to conclude that it is true even without evidence?No. Conclusions without direct observations are very doubtful.

Continue reading